MRS JUSTICE PROUDMAN: But I do not see why you have to assume, simply because it goes from the second defendant’s account into court that it immediately, with one bound, the second respondent is free. Surely you have to look at the security. You have to say, “We do not actually know who is entitled to this money. This was purely a mechanism”, so one takes the £535,000 and one attributes it pro rata to all the respondents.

Maybe this the missing money #HawkinsInsolvencey is looking for…

Join the Conversation


  1. Can I just say what a comfort to find somebody who truly understands what theyre talking about on the net. You certainly understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. A lot more people really need to look at this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more popular because you definitely possess the gift.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *