MRS JUSTICE PROUDMAN: But I do not see why you have to assume, simply because it goes from the second defendant’s account into court that it immediately, with one bound, the second respondent is free. Surely you have to look at the security. You have to say, “We do not actually know who is entitled to this money. This was purely a mechanism”, so one takes the £535,000 and one attributes it pro rata to all the respondents.

Maybe this the missing money #HawkinsInsolvencey is looking for…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *